17 Tweets about the ISTE conference keynote

Today there was what I thought was an engaging Twitter conversation about the ISTE conference keynote crowdsourcing project. Here is the general idea in 17 Tweets…

First, I posted about the latest standings and some backchannel grumblings I’ve been hearing:

[rebelmouse-image-imported /2011/02/18414390.jpg]

Then I heard from John Larkin and Jen Wagner:

[rebelmouse-image-imported /2011/02/18415779.jpg]

[rebelmouse-image-imported /2011/02/18413669.jpg]

Elizabeth Holmes thought the keynote project was a good idea:

[rebelmouse-image-imported /2011/02/18413081.jpg]

But Sylvia Martinez was less enthused:

[rebelmouse-image-imported /2011/02/18415623.jpg]

Julia Fallonwasn’t tookeen either:

[rebelmouse-image-imported /2011/02/18412023.jpg]

[rebelmouse-image-imported /2011/02/18414918.jpg]

[rebelmouse-image-imported /2011/02/18414434.jpg]

Somewhere in there I said:

[rebelmouse-image-imported /2011/02/18414770.jpg]

Gary Stager chimed in:

[rebelmouse-image-imported /2011/02/18415793.jpg]

As did Susan van Gelder:

[rebelmouse-image-imported /2011/02/18413834.jpg]

Which prompted me to ask a question:

[rebelmouse-image-imported /2011/02/18413430.jpg]

I also said:

[rebelmouse-image-imported /2011/02/18413920.jpg]

Susan replied:

[rebelmouse-image-imported /2011/02/18412602.jpg]

Gary also stated:

[rebelmouse-image-imported /2011/02/18416259.jpg]

Which prompted this comment from me:

[rebelmouse-image-imported /2011/02/18414367.jpg]

And, as often happens, Gary got the last word!

[rebelmouse-image-imported /2011/02/18414246.jpg]