# Ask Ethan #73: The Multiverse and you

Is there another version of you somewhere out there in a parallel Universe?

“Go then, there are other worlds than these.” –Stephen King, The Dark Tower

One of the most exciting and enticing topics to speculate about is the idea that *our* reality — *our* Universe the way it is and the way we experience it — might not be the only version of events out there. Perhaps there are other Universes, perhaps even with different versions of ourselves, different histories and alternate outcomes, than our own: a *multiverse* of sorts. For our Ask Ethan column, people of all levels-of-expertise have sent in their questions and suggestions, but this week’s selection comes from a fellow astrophysics researcher, Amanda Mashburn, who asks the following:

I’m curious for your opinion on Multiverse theory. At AAS there was a plenary talk on parallel worlds, specifically if they’re science or sci-fiction. What are your thoughts on the subject?

For those not in-the-know, AAS is the American Astronomical Society, and we had our annual meeting a few weeks ago. The talk on parallel worlds was given by Max Tegmark, and the science goes something like this.

The Universe, as far as the most powerful telescopes can see (even in theory), is vast, huge and massive. Including photons and neutrinos, it contains some 10^90 particles, clumped and clustered together into hundreds-of-billions-to-trillions of galaxies. Each one of those galaxies comes with around a trillion stars inside (on average), and they’re strewn across the cosmos in a sphere some 92 billion light years in diameter, from our perspective.

But, despite what our intuition might tell us, that *doesn’t* mean we’re at the center of a finite Universe. In fact, the evidence indicates something quite to the contrary.

The reason the Universe appears finite in size to us — the reason we can’t see anything that’s more than a specific distance away — isn’t because the Universe is actually finite in size, but is rather because the Universe has only existed in its present state for **a finite amount of time**. If you learn nothing else about the Big Bang, it should be this: the Universe was not constant in space or in time, but rather has evolved from a more uniform, hotter, denser state to a clumpier, cooler and more diffuse state today.

This has given us a rich Universe, replete with many generations of stars, an ultra-cold background of leftover radiation, galaxies expanding away from us ever-more-rapidly the more distant they are, with a limit to how far back we can see. That limit is set by the distance that light has had the ability to travel *since* the instant of the Big Bang.

But this in no way means that there isn’t *more* Universe out there beyond the portion that’s accessible to us. In fact, from both observational and theoretical points-of-view, we have every reason to believe there’s plenty more, and perhaps even *infinitely* more.

Observationally, we can measure a few different interesting quantities, including the spatial curvature of the Universe, how smooth and uniform it is in both temperature and density, and how it’s evolved over time.

What we find is that the Universe is most consistent with being spatially flat, with being uniform over a volume that’s much greater than the volume of the piece of the Universe observable to us, and therefore probably containing **more Universe** that’s very similar to our own for hundreds of billions of light years in all directions, beyond what we can see.

But theoretically, what we learn is even more tantalizing. You see, we can extrapolate the Big Bang backwards to an arbitrarily hot, dense, expanding state, and what we find is that it *didn’t* get infinitely hot and dense early on, but rather that — above some energy and before some very early time — there was a phase that preceded the Big Bang, and set it up.

That phase, a period of cosmological inflation, describes a phase of the Universe where rather than being full of matter and radiation, the Universe was filled with energy inherent to space itself: a state that causes the Universe to expand at an *exponential* rate. This means that rather than having the expansion rate slow as time goes on, at having distant points recede from one another at ever slower speeds, the expansion rate doesn’t drop at all, and distant locations — as time goes on incrementally — get twice as far away, then four times, eight, sixteen, thirty-two, etc.

Because the expansion is not just exponential but also incredibly rapid, “doubling” happens on timescale of around 10^-35 seconds. Meaning, by time 10^-34 seconds have passed, the Universe is around 1000 times its initial size; by time 10^-33 seconds have passed, the Universe is around 10^30 (or 1000^10) times its initial size; by time 10^-32 seconds have passed, the Universe is around 10^300 times its initial size, and so on. Exponential isn’t so powerful because it’s fast; it’s powerful because it’s relentless.

Now, obviously the Universe didn’t continue to expand in this fashion forever, because *we’re here*, and so inflation had to end, setting up the Big Bang. We can think about inflation as occurring at the top of a very flat hill, like a ball rolling slowly down it. As long as the ball remains near the top of the hill, rolling slowly, inflation continues, and the Universe expands exponentially. Once the ball rolls down into the valley, however, inflation ends, and that rolling behavior causes the energy to dissipate, converting the energy inherent to space itself into matter-and-radiation, taking us from an inflationary state into the hot Big Bang.

Before we move on to what we *don’t* know about inflation, there are a few things we *do* know that are worth mentioning.

- Inflation
*isn’t*like a ball — which is a classical field — but is rather like a wave that spreads out over time, like a*quantum*field. - This means that, as time goes on and more-and-more space gets created due to inflation, certain regions, probabilistically, are going to be more likely to see inflation come to an end, while others will be more likely to see inflation continue.
- The regions where inflation ends will give rise to a Big Bang and a Universe like ours, while the regions where it doesn’t will continue to inflate for longer.
- As time goes on, because of the dynamics of expansion, no two regions where inflation ends will ever interact or collide; the regions where inflation
*doesn’t*end will expand between them, pushing them apart.

Now, that’s what we do expect, based on the known laws of physics and the observables that exist in our Universe to tell us about the inflationary state. That said, we *don’t* know quite a few things about this inflationary state, and what this does is bring up a huge number of both uncertainties and also possibilities:

- We don’t know for
*how long*the inflationary state lasted before it ended and gave rise to the Big Bang. The Universe could barely be larger than the part observable to us, it could be many ridiculous orders of magnitude larger than what we see, or it could be truly infinite in scale. - We don’t know if the regions where inflation ended are all the same, or whether they’re vastly different than our own. It’s conceivable that there are (unknown) physical dynamics that cause things like the fundamental constants — particle masses, strengths of forces, the amount of dark energy — to be exactly what they are for us in
*all*regions where inflation ends. But it’s also possible that different regions where inflation ends, what we might consider*different Universes*, have arbitrarily different physics. - And
*if*the Universes are all the same as one another as far as physical laws go, and*if*the number of these Universes is truly infinite,**and**if the many-world interpretation of quantum mechanics is completely valid, does that mean that there are parallel Universes out there, where everything in it evolved exactly the same as our own Universe did, except one tiny quantum outcome was different?

In other worlds, would it be possible that there’s a Universe out there where everything happened exactly as it did in this one, except *you* did one tiny thing different, and hence had your life turn out incredibly different as a result?

Where you chose the job overseas instead of the one that kept you in your country?

Where you stood up to the bully instead of letting yourself be taken advantage of?

Where you kissed the one-who-got-away at the end of the night, instead of letting them go?

And where the life-or-death event that you or your loved one faced at some point in the past had a different outcome?

It’s an incredible notion: that there’s a Universe out there for every outcome that’s conceivable. There’s one where *everything* with a non-zero probability of having happened is *actually the reality* in that Universe.

But there are an awful lot of **if**s that are mandatory to get there. For one, the inflationary state must have happened for not just a *long* amount of time — not just for the 13.8 billion years that our Universe has been around — but for an *infinite* amount of time.

Why is that, you ask? Surely, if the Universe has been expanding exponentially — not just for a tiny fraction of a second but for 13.8 billion years, or around **4 × 10^17 seconds** — we’re talking about a tremendous volume of space! After all, even though there are regions of space where inflation ends, most of the volume of the Universe is dominated by regions where it hasn’t ended.

So realistically, we’re talking about at least **10^10^50** Universes that started off with initial conditions that might be very similar to our own. That’s 10^100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Universes, which might be one of the biggest numbers you’ve ever imagined. And yet, there are numbers that are bigger that describe how many possible outcomes there are for particle interactions.

There are 10^90 particles in each Universe, and we need for all of them to have the *exact same* history of interactions for **13.8 billion years** to give us a Universe identical to our own, so that when we choose one path over another, both Universes still wind up existing. For a Universe with 10^90 quantum particles in it, that’s asking an awful lot — for fewer than 10^10^50 possibilities to exist for how those particles will interact with one another over 13.8 billion years. The number you see above, for instance, is just 1000! (or (10^3)!), or 1000 factorial, which describes the number of possible permutations there are for 1000 different particles to be ordered at any instant in time. Consider, mind you, how *much* bigger this number is — (10^3)! — than (10^1000) is.

(10^3)!, for those of you wondering, is more like 10^2477.

But there are not *1000* particles in the Universe, but 10^90 of them. Every time two particles interact, there’s not just *one* possible outcome, but an entire quantum spectrum of outcomes. As sad as the case is, there are *way more* than (10^90)! possible outcomes for the particles in the Universe, and *that* number is many googolplexes times larger than a paltry number like 10^10^50.

In other words, the number of possible outcomes from particles in any Universe interacting with one another tends towards infinity *faster* than the number of possible Universes increases due to inflation.

Even setting aside issues that there may be an infinite number of possible values for fundamental constants, particles and interactions, and even setting aside interpretation issues such as whether the many-worlds-interpretation actually describes our physical reality, the fact of the matter is that the number of possible outcomes rises so quickly — so much *faster* than merely exponentially — that unless inflation has been occurring for a **truly infinite** amount of time, there are no parallel Universes identical to this one.

The singularity theorem tells us that an inflationary state is past-timelike-incomplete, and hence, most probably did *not* last a truly infinite amount of time, but rather arose some distant-but-finite point in the past. There are a *huge* number of Universes out there — possibly with different laws than our own and possibly not — but there are not *enough* of them to give us alternate versions of ourselves; the number of possible outcomes grows too rapidly compared to the rate that the number of possible Universes grows.

So what does this mean for you?

It means it’s up to you to make this Universe count. Make the choices that leave you with no regrets: take the dream job, stand up for yourself, navigate through the pitfalls as best you can, and go all-out every day of your life. There is no other Universe that has this version of you in it, and there is no future for you other than the one you live yourself into.

Make it the best one possible.

Thanks for a great topic, Amanda, at the intersection of physics, philosophy, and right at the limits of the physically knowable. While parallel Universes are still fertile ground for exploring the possibilities, our current understanding of what they require leaves them highly disfavored, at least for alternate versions of ourselves.

And if you’ve got a topic you’d like to see addressed on next week’s Ask Ethan, send in your questions and suggestions here. You never know: the next Ask Ethan might be especially for you!

*Leave your comments at **the Starts With A Bang forum on Scienceblogs**!*