Skip to content
Technology & Innovation

Edward Snowden Does Not Exist

In this episode of The Amazing Adventures of Edward Snowden, our hero fools a cadre of journalists into believing he is en route to Havana in search of political asylum.

What’s the Latest Development?


In this episode of The Amazing Adventures of Edward Snowden, our hero fools a cadre of journalists into believing he is en route to Havana in search of political asylum. Eager to reach Snowden before Johnny Law does, the journalists book their tickets for Snowden’s alleged flight. Alas, his seat is left dramatically empty, also leaving the world’s media with bated breath. Thanks to the help of WikiLeaks and his CIA training, Snowden remains one step ahead of J.L. What a cipher of a guy! Stay tuned to find out how we’ll not be discussing the merits of the NSA surveillance program!

Smarter faster: the Big Think newsletter
Subscribe for counterintuitive, surprising, and impactful stories delivered to your inbox every Thursday

What’s the Big Idea?

Nothing spells diversion quite like a CIA man-of-mystery and a pole-dancing girlfriend who blogs about her life. Snowden’s candor about sacrificing his professional career for his democratic ideals is the perfect coverstory for a plot to keep the details of the NSA’s digital surveillance off the front pages (everyone loves a hero). “The genius of the plan is that it offers an emotional arc and payoff that feels like it’s about the NSA story. … There will, presumably, be an eventual resolution to the Snowden story, such that those following it feel they have a sense of closure and can move onto other topics.”

Photo credit: Shutterstock.com

Read it at the Washington Post


Related

Up Next

A Brief Guide to a Big Week at The Supreme Court

This week, The Supreme Court of The United States will hand down decisions on a number of major issues. Here is what you need to know to stay up to date with the three biggest ones: 1) The court already ruled today on its Affirmative Action case, you can read the majority opinion here. A prospective student sued the University of Texas on the grounds that she had been denied admission in place of somebody who had allegedly been admitted based on racial factors. Supporters had hoped that a broad ruling might illegalize the practice of factoring race into admission across the board. The takeaway from the ruling is not negligible but is not the sweeping change many people expected. By and large, the court kicked the decision back down to a lower court.  The other two each regard gay rights. 2) DOMA, The Defense of Marriage Act, which was signed into law by Bill Clinton in 1996, is under fire in the case of United States V. Windsor. The court did not offer a ruling, but one is expected soon, most likely Tuesday morning. The government is being sued on the grounds that married gay couples do not receive the same federal benefits as straight couples. You can read about the relationship to political policy here. 3) Proposition 8, the controversial California ballot issue, is also being challenged in the case of Hollingsworth V. Perry. While the legal matter is ostensibly a voting rights issue, this is being viewed as primarily an issue with same-sex marriage in America’s most populous state. Depending on which way it goes, and what the majority opinion dictates, this could have ramifications for the legality and the illegality of gay marriage in other states as well. You can read more of our coverage on the development of this case here and here.