Skip to content
Technology & Innovation

In Defense of Paulson and Fuld

Sign up for the Smarter Faster newsletter
A weekly newsletter featuring the biggest ideas from the smartest people

For this week’s installment of What Went Wrong?, we bring you the media perspective from Andrew Ross Sorkin, New York Times columnist and author of “Too Big To Fail,” and Chrystia Freeland, U.S. Managing Editor of the Financial Times.

Sorkin defends three things that have gotten a bad rap during the economic meltdown: Hank Paulson, financial television and Dick Fuld. History may look more fondly upon Paulson than he’s given credit for today, says Sorkin.  And as for TV coverage of the crisis, it wasn’t as bad as people think. If anyone should know, it’s Sorkin—in his research for “Too Big To Fail,” he sifted through hours and hours of tapes. It’s no doubt that Dick Fuld has emerged as one of the poster children for the crisis, but that’s another thing with which Sorkin disagrees. As he points out, Morgan Stanley’s John Mack could have suffered the same fate as Fuld, had Mitsubishi not come to save them, or had the government not made them a bank holding company.


Freeland tackles questions about the push-pull between the news and editorial divisions of a global financial newspaper. She maintains that her publication aims to build a broad church of opinion, and insists that she is proud of the FT’s coverage of the economic crisis, especially those pieces by Martin Wolfe. Even the most ideal journalism wouldn’t have stopped the crisis, says Freeland.

Freeland also dissects the Efficient Markets Hypothesis (of which she is a vocal critic), and explains why it is one of the biggest casualties of the last year. Her big takeaway? Individual players pursuing individual interests collectively will not always create an outcome which is good for the collective or even for those individual players.

A network of top economics bloggers provided some questions for the interviews. They also  weigh in on the answers every week:

Economist’s View – Mark Thoma, Professor of Economics, University of Oregon

Economics One – John B. Taylor, Professor of Economics, Stanford University and former Undersecretary for International Affairs, U.S. Treasury Department

The New Republic’s The Stash– Noam Scheiber

The New Yorker’s The Balance SheetJames Surowiecki – Columnist, and author of bestseller The Wisdom of Crowds

Marginal Revolution – Tyler Cowen, Professor of Economics, George Mason University

Reuters Finance, Felix Salmon

The American Prospect’s Beat the Press – Dean Baker, Professor of Economics, Bucknell University and Co-Director, Center for Economic Policy Research

The Money Illusion – Scott Sumner, Professor of Economics, Bentley University

Café Hayek – Russ Roberts, Professor of Economics, George Mason University and a research fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution

The Atlantic’s Atlantic Business Channel – Dan Indiviglio

The Fly Bottle – Will Wilkinson, Research Fellow, Cato Institute

The Big Questions – Steven Landsburg – Professor of Economics, University of Rochester and Columnist, Slate

Econlog – Arnold Kling, Adjunct Professor of Economics, George Mason University and former employee of both Freddie Mac and the Federal Reserve

The Atlantic’sAsymmetrical Information – Megan McArdle, Managing Editor, The Atlantic

Causes of the Crisis – Jeff Friedman, Visiting Professor of Political Science, University of Texas and Founding Editor, Critical Review,

National Review’sThe Corner/The American Scene – Jim Manzi – Chief Executive Officer, Applied Predictive Technologies

The Economist’sFree Exchange/The Bellows – Ryan Avent, Online Editor, The Economist

Naked Capitalism – Yves Smith, President of Aurora Advisors, and former employee of both Goldman Sachs and McKinsey & Co.

Sign up for the Smarter Faster newsletter
A weekly newsletter featuring the biggest ideas from the smartest people

Related
We asked our experts where they see the biggest blockers right now for more progress. Essentially, from their various areas of focus, what did they see as the largest impediments to driving progress forward around the world and how they would prioritize the necessary interventions? The answers were appropriately varied from the philosophical to the political to the technological.

Up Next