In 2004, the UK thought it had found a suitable compromise to legalizing same-sex marriage. But civil partnerships, which are equal to marriage in every legal respect, have become insufficient for those seeking advances in human rights. Now, a bill stands before the British parliament that would legalize same-sex marriage. “Both opponents and supporters of the bill concede that marriage has changed in various ways over time,” said Robert Skidelsky, a member of the British House of Lords. “They also agree that a central core has remained constant. But they disagree about what that core is.”
Subscribe for counterintuitive, surprising, and impactful stories delivered to your inbox every Thursday
What’s the Big Idea?
Opponents of the bill argue that marriage has not historically been a “long envelope” into which any expression of love and commitment can be placed. “It is not so regarded in contemporary Britain; and even less so in the non-Western world, where unions of men and women are considered the norm.” But, said Skidelsky, “there is a glaring weakness in the arguments of the bill’s opponents: while they hint darkly at the ‘unintended consequences’ of legalizing same-sex marriage, they cannot spell out exactly what these consequences would be.”