Skip to content
Who's in the Video
Marc Lasry is one of the pioneers of the distressed securities market, which has been the exclusive focus of his professional career. Marc is a Founder and Managing Partner of[…]

Hedge fund founder Marc Lasry evaluates the government’s handling of the Chrysler bankruptcy and compares this financial crisis to previous ones.

Question: Given your history of investing in distressed debt, how is this crisis different from previous crises?

Marc Lasry: I think the biggest difference in any of those crises, it was never an issue of whether the banking system could fail. It was always really a question of what was going on with that particular situation, and nobody was worried that the system as a whole wouldn't be there. That was the biggest difference, so I think in this crisis it became a very binary bet. Was the banking system going to be around, or would the banking system fail? So I think the government did everything they could to make sure it didn't. And I actually think they were exceptionally successful in that, because right now what everybody's arguing about is, how long is it going to take for recovery? Nobody's arguing as to whether we're going to fail or not. So I think because of that, it was actually extremely different. And when you look, whether it was the Asian crisis or some of the other crises we've had, the question was -- you got very quickly to how long was the recovery -- you know, how long would it take for things to recover? You didn't go through a period, which we went through in this crisis, of would the system still be around?

Question: What are your predictions for the near to intermediate term?

Marc Lasry: I think for over the course of the next two or three years, in our opinion, GDP will be kind of flat; maybe it's up a little bit. But there isn't going to be as much liquidity as there used to be, and you have about $1 trillion of debt that's coming due over the next three to four years. So I think what you're going to find is, there's still going to be a huge amount of opportunities over the course of the next two to four years.

I think our biggest concern is really what's going to be the driver for the economy. I think there's a belief that it's got to be through consumer spending, and our view is that consumers are spending less. So I think when we look at 2010, we're trying to figure out what's going to drive this economy. And I think we're a little bit nervous if everybody's relying on the consumer.

Question: Have you seen more or less foreign investment in hedge funds since the crisis? (Dan Indiviglio, The Atlantic Business Channel)

Marc Lasry: I think there's probably been less, and the reason there's been less is, there's been a lot of capital that's been taken out. I think this year -- well, maybe next year you'll start seeing the capital start coming back in, because as people have gotten comfortable that there's no longer any systemic risk to the system, then they'll start reinvesting. And I think also there's just less leverage out there.

Question: How should the government have better handled the Chrysler bankruptcy?

Marc Lasry: I don't know that they should have done anything differently. It’s sort of what the reality was. And I think the government -- what they ended up doing was probably the best thing for the country. So as a creditor you may not have been excited about that, because I think a number of creditors got hurt, but they were the ones putting in the money. And if you're putting in the money, at times you get to rewrite the rules. So what it did is make you aware that going forward, if the government's putting in money, that things may be different. And I think you take that into consideration as you're making an investment.

Question: How did the Chrysler situation differ from other potential bankruptcies, including GM or AIG?

Marc Lasry: It was very different. I mean, I think in Chrysler what you ended up having was, the government ended up dictating who's going to own the new equity and how much bondholders or banks were going to end up receiving. I think in AIG, the government came in on the equity side, and because of that, the bondholders haven't been hurt. And I would say it's the same thing on GMAC; they came in on the preferred side. So bondholders haven't been injured, and it's really equity that's been diluted, so it's been a pretty big difference.

Question: Is the bankruptcy code sufficient to deal with the failure of large firms?

Marc Lasry: I think the bankruptcy code is able to handle that. I When you're dealing with financial firms, it becomes extremely complicated, as the Lehman bankruptcy has shown. And I think you've got a number of bankruptcies where you have very large firms. It's complicated because of the fact that they are large, and they have different assets, and there's different liabilities. I think the code can handle all of those things; I think what people need to remember is, the more complicated a company is, the harder it's going to be for people to analyze and for things to get done.

Recorded on December 4, 2009